In 2026, investors should rebalance portfolios to embrace greater diversification, thoughtfully navigate opportunities in artificial intelligence, and prioritize investments across the electricity transmission value chain. With heightened equity risks and a weakening US dollar, a disciplined, multi-asset approach will help strengthen portfolio resilience and capture emerging growth themes.
Investors can simplify net zero implementation by prioritizing practical and pragmatic steps towards real world emissions reduction. We provide both a feasible pathway to climate impact for investors with a mature portfolio and a template for building a net zero portfolio from scratch.
We expect more companies will set science-based targets to reduce their emissions and develop credible transition plans to meet their targets. We believe funds raised by natural capital strategies will hit a new record and that California carbon allowances will outperform global equities.
While climate awareness is essential for all investors, others seek to be more ambitious by adopting a net zero goal for their portfolios. This paper explains the rationale for doing so and outlines an approach for target setting and implementation. A net zero policy focuses on decarbonizing the real economy. Investors have two powerful levers to do this: (1) stewardship and engagement; and (2) climate solution investments.
We expect meaningful shifts in net zero and other sustainable and impact strategies toward more impactful implementation approaches. In line with this, we expect allocations to diverse managers to rise, as greater numbers of investors embrace stated investment policy objectives.
Investors are increasingly pursuing climate change–related agendas for both better investment outcomes and alignment with their stakeholders’ beliefs. This paper provides a high-level overview of the net-zero investing topic and considers practical implementation options for investors.
While valuations continue to support a tactical overweight to emerging markets equities today, the rationale for a permanent or structural overweight is weaker Many of the classic arguments for a strategic overweight to emerging markets (potential for faster economic growth, underrepresentation in indices, diversification, and inefficiency of markets) lack convincing support or have diminished in…